Rambles . . .

Another one . . .

After the other day’s experiment comparing how Lumix S and Leica SL perform with the SL2’s “spot” focus, I added a Lumix S 20-60mm kit zoom and tested it, again against the Summilux-SL. Same result. The one failing of the zoom was that “spot” didn’t work well at MFD at 60mm, but did just fine…

It’s the lens!

More than once on these pages I’ve ranted about the AF area spot-that’s-not-a-spot on the SL2 and SL2-S. Out with the Summilux-SL 50mm this afternoon, I wanted to focus on a narrow strip of paper about 2 inches wide that was hanging from a string. AF balked a couple of times before settling on the…

Inching . . .

I’ve long suspected that the CL’s internals were designed by Panasonic people and that the SL and SL2 were done with at least a significant amount of help from Panasonic. I could be wrong, but why else would Leica have cited the “disbanding” of the team of CL’s engineers as a partial excuse for offering…

Looking ahead . . .

Oh, those rumor sites . . . Sigma teasing about a sequel to their versatile fp series, Panasonic promising some interesting bodies, Leica . . . ummm, well, Leica finally admitting to a significant firmware issue with the SL3. For a while I stuck with M and R lenses because they could be adapted to…

Another rerun . . .

The Summilux-SL 50mm is heavy. Autofocus with the lens is slow. Image quality, according to Leica and many of its users, is reference standard. These are knowns. I live with the former two and enjoy the latter. Anyone who follows these pages knows I’m not too trusting of autofocus in cameras and lenses. In fact,…

Calling time on R . . .

A while back, maybe more than once on these pages, I mentioned that much of the R glass I was seeing at the time was not in great shape. The last copies of the 280mm f/4 APO-Telyt-R and 80mm Summilux-R I had were ditched because of their deteriorating condition. With the exception of a 180mm…

The weight of it . . .

Conventional wisdom might lead one to think that it’s necessary to pare down gear weight as one ages. But while it might be a favorable notion, recent experiences taught me that it’s not always necessary. For six weeks of hiking during which I averaged well over 20 kilometers per day, it was necessary for me…

On second thought . . .

. . . maybe I was a bit harsh in my assessment of the Sigma 17mm f4. Out yesterday to shoot the Asoke intersection, as I’ve done regularly over the past two decades with whatever wide glass I happened to have at the time, I noticed how detailed the image was from corner to corner….

Plus one, minus two . . .

During the past year or two I’ve been heading toward a conclusion that while Leica was without peer when it came to optics and mechanics, they are now without hope when it comes to electronics. But there’s not enough space here to get into that one. After reacquiring an R-Adapter-L and vaguely remembering that there…

Novoflex vs. Leica

Having two days ago picked up an almost new-looking 135mm f2.8 Elmarit-R that’s 46 years old, I found that it wouldn’t focus to infinity at the infinity hard stop. Since an R 28-90mm I’d acquired a few days before was right on the money wide open at 90mm at the infinity hard stop, and not…